UK Ministry Trip: Biblical Manhood and the Crowded House
I was encouraged by the response to a message I
gave on Wednesday to the men of the Crowded House Church in Sheffield on
Biblical Manhood. They were receptive, thoughtful and eager. This is a church
of biblical health.
Principles of a complementarian view of manhood
and womanhood can be taught from the pulpit and verbally affirmed, but many
marriages are functionally egalitarian. In other words, application of the
truth is the issue.
That is why it was good to have a question and
answer time where the men could press into the “what does this look like on the
ground?” stuff.
One particular question raised by Steve Timmis
(co-founder of The Crowded House and Director of Acts 29 Europe) was this:
“Would you make a man an elder if, although he
was complementarian and sought to lead, protect and provide for his wife, she
was pushing back and was strongly egalitarian?”
This is a good question, and one where manhood
and womanhood, marriage and church leadership intersect. The couple are both
believers, he wants to see headship and submission lived out, the church are
teaching it, he is praying for her and loving her but is aware that he should not
force or coerce her. Would you make this man an elder?
My response in short was, “No, wait”. I base my
answer on the following:
b.) An elder must be an example for the flock (1Cor.
11:1; 1Tim. 4:12; Ti. 2:1:2, 3:5; 1 Peter 5:3). In his essay “The Church as Family”, (Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, Grudem and Piper, 244),
Vern Sheridan Poythress says:
“…fathers” of the church
stand out. Mature, sober, sound, godly men with exemplary family lives are the natural
leaders in this extended family. First, the whole
church naturally treats them as fathers and perceives
the leadership abilities they exercise in their own immediate families…church leadership
in a situation of family intimacy is like family
leadership-a matter not primarily of laying down formal rules but
of setting a good example that
naturally engenders admiration and that
people attempt to emulate.”
How could a man be an
elder in a church, which is teaching the importance of headship and submission
as a creation issue and a Gospel issue, and yet it not be modeled in his own
marriage?
So
waiting gives time for the situation to change and for God to work through the
continued prayer and leadership of the husband, plus the counsel of the elders
who should be brought into the picture at some stage. A conflict of approach to
headship and submission will bring up conflict in the home. If submission is being
taught in the church and a wife refuses to subscribe to it, then she resists giving
submission to her husband’s headship and
the leadership of the church. Remember, this is a central issue for the church.
So elders have a responsibility alongside the husband to lovingly teach and correct
the wife.
One
may argue that it seems harsh to delay the appointment of this man as an elder,
because it is not his fault if he is ultimately doing all he can. Well, one
must also be apt to teach to be an elder; that aptitude is not there with every
man, and that’s not his fault either. The glory of God is what matters most,
and the church is central to that because she is the Bride of Christ. The Bride
must be led and protected and nourished. When you make headship and submission
in the home and the church a God thing, it switches the focus away from “self”
and “rights” and towards the Gospel.